Re: need good IDE
From: jacob navia (jacob_at_jacob.remcomp.fr)
Date: 02/18/05
- Next message: Gregory Toomey: "Re: Fast addition for n+1 or n+0"
- Previous message: Stephen Sprunk: "Re: C portability is a myth"
- In reply to: Alex: "Re: need good IDE"
- Next in thread: User Epoxy: "Re: need good IDE"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 09:42:59 +0100
Alex wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 13:57:48 -0800, Zach wrote:
>
>
>>Running Windows 98 SE and Debian GNU Linux (unstable release) with
>>2.4.18 kernel.
>>
>
>
> If you are not interested in a complete compiler-suite, like Borland or
> Visual-Studio, but seek an IDE for any compiler, you might want to have a
> look at IBMs Eclipse platform.
>
> It was originally developed for Java, but it has a series of plugins,
> supporting, among others C/C++. Since it is written in Java, it works on
> any platform that supports Java.
>
> Have a look at http://www.eclipse.org. The C/C++ Development Tools can be
> found at http://www.eclipse.org/cdt
>
> regards,
> Alex
It is interesting to see how an IDE written in C compares to that one.
Eclipse is 87.5 MB zip file
lcc-win32 is 4MB zip.
lcc-win32 is a true C ide, i.e. it provides:
o goto definition (eclipse doesn't do it as far as I see)
o debugger (eclipse uses GDB!)
o Resource editor (not in eclipse as far as I see)
o linker and compiler (not in eclipse)
Here we see how C compares to Java...
- Next message: Gregory Toomey: "Re: Fast addition for n+1 or n+0"
- Previous message: Stephen Sprunk: "Re: C portability is a myth"
- In reply to: Alex: "Re: need good IDE"
- Next in thread: User Epoxy: "Re: need good IDE"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|