Re: stdio.h ?
From: Walter Roberson (roberson_at_ibd.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca)
Date: 03/08/05
- Next message: Walter Roberson: "Re: if (-1) returns true"
- Previous message: Walter Roberson: "Re: stdio.h ?"
- In reply to: \(ProteanThread\): "Re: stdio.h ?"
- Next in thread: \(ProteanThread\): "Re: stdio.h ?"
- Reply: \(ProteanThread\): "Re: stdio.h ?"
- Reply: Mark McIntyre: "Re: stdio.h ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 8 Mar 2005 21:24:41 GMT
In article <1110314389.d4527d3074cde45f4ace6396d62a5df4@teranews>,
\(ProteanThread\) <sysop@rtdos.com> wrote:
:ok, few more questions:
:1. what's a tyger?
The old spelling of 'tiger'. On old maps, in places unknown and
potentially dangerous, it was supposedly common to put on the map,
"Beyond here be tygers."
:3. is "stdio.h" always necessary in plain C?
No! The C89 standard says in a footnote,
89. A header is not nessisarily a source file [...]
-- Are we *there* yet??
- Next message: Walter Roberson: "Re: if (-1) returns true"
- Previous message: Walter Roberson: "Re: stdio.h ?"
- In reply to: \(ProteanThread\): "Re: stdio.h ?"
- Next in thread: \(ProteanThread\): "Re: stdio.h ?"
- Reply: \(ProteanThread\): "Re: stdio.h ?"
- Reply: Mark McIntyre: "Re: stdio.h ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
