Re: set and reset the least significant bit of a address
From: jacob navia (jacob_at_jacob.remcomp.fr)
Date: 03/15/05
- Next message: Eric Sosman: "Re: ASM => C"
- Previous message: Dan Pop: "Re: Does a C89 compliant compiler exist?"
- In reply to: Peter Nilsson: "Re: set and reset the least significant bit of a address"
- Next in thread: onsbomma: "Re: set and reset the least significant bit of a address"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 23:56:57 +0100
You are right, the intptr_t is optional. Sorry.
In the other post I stated that they weren't.
jacob
- Next message: Eric Sosman: "Re: ASM => C"
- Previous message: Dan Pop: "Re: Does a C89 compliant compiler exist?"
- In reply to: Peter Nilsson: "Re: set and reset the least significant bit of a address"
- Next in thread: onsbomma: "Re: set and reset the least significant bit of a address"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
