Re: Memory management strategy
- From: Paul Mesken <usurper@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 19:40:08 +0200
On Mon, 30 May 2005 19:12:45 +0200, Paul Mesken <usurper@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>You're right for pointing out that replacing a recursive function with
>a function that uses some kind of stack hardly gives some code size
>gains (although such a function would still be safer than a recursive
>function).
Errr... I meant, of course :
....uses some kind of stack hardly gives some code/data size gains.
Or just "size", for short :-)
.
- References:
- Memory management strategy
- From: ira2402
- Re: Memory management strategy
- From: Paul Mesken
- Re: Memory management strategy
- From: Walter Roberson
- Re: Memory management strategy
- From: Paul Mesken
- Memory management strategy
- Prev by Date: Re: Function calls using variables
- Next by Date: Re: sizeof...
- Previous by thread: Re: Memory management strategy
- Next by thread: Re: Memory management strategy
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|