Re: Some pointer quiestions again
- From: Mac <foo@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 18:53:43 GMT
On Tue, 31 May 2005 17:45:08 +0000, Jens.Toerring wrote:
[snip]
> [...] requiring that all pointer types
> can be converted to and from a void pointer [...]
Isn't this supposed to be all _object_ pointer types or something like
that? What I am getting at is that ISTR that you cannot store a function
pointer in a void pointer.
--Mac
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Some pointer quiestions again
- From: Robert Gamble
- Re: Some pointer quiestions again
- From: Jens . Toerring
- Re: Some pointer quiestions again
- References:
- Some pointer quiestions again
- From: junky_fellow
- Re: Some pointer quiestions again
- From: Jens . Toerring
- Some pointer quiestions again
- Prev by Date: Re: Multiple return statements Vs goto's
- Next by Date: Re: sizeof...
- Previous by thread: Re: Some pointer quiestions again
- Next by thread: Re: Some pointer quiestions again
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|