Re: Bit twiddling

From: Paul Mesken <usurper@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 16:47:07 +0200

On Fri, 03 Jun 2005 16:44:04 +0200, Paul Mesken <usurper@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

>No, because you cannot have an array of bitfields (something like
>"signed int Bit[8]:1;").

"usigned" might be a better choice, given the size of the field ;-)

.

References:
- Bit twiddling
  - From: grid
- Re: Bit twiddling
  - From: grid
- Re: Bit twiddling
  - From: Paul Mesken

Prev by Date: Re: Bit twiddling
Next by Date: Re: why debug step by step, it s ok
Previous by thread: Re: Bit twiddling
Next by thread: Re: Bit twiddling
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread