Re: The status of C
- From: "Malcolm" <regniztar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 21:30:57 +0000 (UTC)
"Emmanuel Delahaye" <emdel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
>
>>> I (Paris, France) work on embedded systems for telecom (MPC, Xscale,
>>> DSP, Embedded Linux) C is not an option.
>>
>> Just a clarification. Do you mean that only C is allowed <...>
>
> Yes. Sorry for being unclear.
>
English lesson.
"C is not an option" means "C may not be used".
"C is not optional" means we may not refuse to use C.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The status of C
- From: Emmanuel Delahaye
- Re: The status of C
- References:
- The status of C
- From: Martin Johansen
- Re: The status of C
- From: Emmanuel Delahaye
- Re: The status of C
- From: Robert W Hand
- Re: The status of C
- From: Emmanuel Delahaye
- The status of C
- Prev by Date: Re: pure functions
- Next by Date: Re: The status of C
- Previous by thread: Re: The status of C
- Next by thread: Re: The status of C
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|