Re: Floatin point issues
- From: "Suman" <skarpio@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 Jun 2005 05:59:19 -0700
sandeep wrote:
> I think you are a good watchman
> Look for a job of watchman.
Don't be a spoilsport!
This is not how you reply to others over a newsgroup.You may have
opinions
that differ, but this is not the way to show it.Every one out here
is(or atleast
tries) to help others..I am not sure how many have already
done it, but few must have, by this time kill(fil)ed you!Get some basic
netiquette training.
You will of course see posts(past, present & future) by respected
regulars that
delve in expletives, but most of the time they fit the context.Not
yours.This is
streetfight.
And don't you reply to me asking me why I am supporting them - I have
my own
reasons, that (your) reasons cannot comprehend.
.
- References:
- Floatin point issues
- From: sandeep
- Re: Floatin point issues
- From: Martin Ambuhl
- Re: Floatin point issues
- From: sandeep
- Re: Floatin point issues
- From: Neil Kurzman
- Re: Floatin point issues
- From: sandeep
- Floatin point issues
- Prev by Date: #defines and strings
- Next by Date: why use -> (not .) with pointers?
- Previous by thread: Re: Floatin point issues
- Next by thread: Re: Floatin point issues
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|