Re: casting to unsigned char for is*() and to*() functions
- From: "James Daughtry" <mordock32@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 Jun 2005 13:37:01 -0700
> make plain char an unsigned type.
Why do I get the feeling that this is the best solution for everyone to
begin with? Muddy areas do nothing but get your shoes messy, so it's
better to wander around them, no?
> The Standard does not govern your expectations. ;-)
That's a shame! Here I've been expecting a well toasted bran muffin
with hot tea and orange juice every morning, but my implementation
fails to provide it consistently. Live and learn.
> What would the "special treatement" be?
Special. But I'm pretty sure it falls under some kind of non-disclosure
agreement, as most special things do, so I can't really say... ;-)
.
- References:
- casting to unsigned char for is*() and to*() functions
- From: mr_semantics
- Re: casting to unsigned char for is*() and to*() functions
- From: Eric Sosman
- Re: casting to unsigned char for is*() and to*() functions
- From: James Daughtry
- Re: casting to unsigned char for is*() and to*() functions
- From: Eric Sosman
- casting to unsigned char for is*() and to*() functions
- Prev by Date: Re: Portability
- Next by Date: Re: #defines and strings
- Previous by thread: Re: casting to unsigned char for is*() and to*() functions
- Next by thread: Re: casting to unsigned char for is*() and to*() functions
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
