Re: Macro calling kernel function
- From: CBFalconer <cbfalconer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 02:10:46 GMT
David wrote:
>
> Ok let me be more specific, I want to do this in header file. Is
> it still possbile?
Usenet articles are delivered hither and thither, with no
guarantees of timing, retention, other articles, etc. Thus they
must always stand on their own. Yours doesn't. Specific about
what? Is what possible? etc. Always include adequate context, even
if you are using that thrice cursed google interface. In which
case you can lessen the curse by heeding the advice in my sig,
below.
Google is not usenet, only a very poor news server, and a very
useful archiver. Their server interface is so poor that they have
become a laughing stock, and have exceeded OE in foulness.
--
"If you want to post a followup via groups.google.com, don't use
the broken "Reply" link at the bottom of the article. Click on
"show options" at the top of the article, then click on the
"Reply" at the bottom of the article headers." - Keith Thompson
.
- References:
- Macro calling kernel function
- From: David
- Re: Macro calling kernel function
- From: Artie Gold
- Re: Macro calling kernel function
- From: David
- Macro calling kernel function
- Prev by Date: apparent 4 GB memory limit for brk() in solaris 8 on some hardware...?
- Next by Date: Re: apparent 4 GB memory limit for brk() in solaris 8 on some hardware...?
- Previous by thread: Re: Macro calling kernel function
- Next by thread: Re: Macro calling kernel function
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|