Re: apparent 4 GB memory limit for brk() in solaris 8 on some hardware...?



clsmyth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> Folks,
>
> Hi, I have never posted to a language group before so please excuse me
> if this is inappropriate. I have posted this to comp.unix.solaris
> (well, I am one of the folks on the thread at least)...the subject is
> "4 GB hard constraint on a Solaris 8 server". I figured I'd post over
> here because we aren't getting anywhere too fast over there, and I
> think it is a code issue.
>
> We have a piece of software that we purchased. It is a single-thread
> process that does a lot of calculations in memory and then spits out
> some results. The server it is running on is dedicated to it and it
> alone. It is a 4-way (yes, a waste) 16 GB RAM SunFire V440 running
> Solaris 8, patched to the latest recommended/security patch cluster (as
> in, yesterday). The process grows to about 4 GB in RAM and then spits
> out an error like this:
.... snip ...

It is inappropriate here. We discuss the _portable_ C language, as
defined in the ISO standards. The moment you have to mention a
particular compiler or system it doesn't belong here. I think you
had the right milieu in the first place, but are too verbose. Cut
things down to something compilable that exhibits the problem and
is under 100 lines.

--
"If you want to post a followup via groups.google.com, don't use
the broken "Reply" link at the bottom of the article. Click on
"show options" at the top of the article, then click on the
"Reply" at the bottom of the article headers." - Keith Thompson

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Tarbert - Accident
    ... :>: and why are inappropriate while people are grieving. ... Ian "Howdy, folks" J ... Prev by Date: ...
    (uk.rec.sailing)
  • Re: Another brilliant solution to Americas problems....
    ... I don't have issue with the reality of those folks who have access, ... be an extreme hardship situation in the event of a cold winter. ... inappropriate. ...
    (alt.gathering.rainbow)