Re: Flexible size array

Robert Gamble wrote: 
Christopher Benson-Manica wrote:

Is the following program conforming under C99?

#include <stdio.h>

typedef struct foo {
 int bar;
 int baz[];
} foo;

foo foos[]={
 { 1, {1,2,3} }
};

int main() {
    return 0;
}



No, it's not.  It is a constraint violation for a structure containing
a flexible array to be a member of a structure or an array.

I also don't think that you can initialize the flexible array part in
the declaration so something like this wouldn't work either:

foo foo1 = { 1, {1, 2, 3} };

although this would be okay:

foo foo1 = {1};


gcc -Wall -pedantic -std=c99 (3.3.3 for cygwin) accepts the program
without the declaration for the array of foo structs, but issues an
error about "initialization of a flexible array member in a nested
context" on the program above.  Is it correct?



It is correct that there is a problem with your code.  I think the
particular error message you are referring to has to do with the fact
that that gcc allows static initialization of flexible arrays as well
as an array of structures containing flexible array member.  Because of
this, things get complicated when you try to statically initialize such
an array so gcc disallows this.


Moreover, according to the standard the signature of `main' should be either

   int main(void)

or

   int main(int argc, char *argv[])

(Guess Java makes people forget `void' in C function headers with empty parameter lists.)


August
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: struct compatibility
    ... > Michael Mair wrote:>> Christian Kandeler wrote:>>> I'd like to know whether the following code is standard-compliant:>>> ... >>> int x; ... But if I use a flexible array:> ...
    (comp.lang.c)
  • Re: Flexible size array
    ... > typedef struct foo { ... a flexible array to be a member of a structure or an array. ... that that gcc allows static initialization of flexible arrays as well ...
    (comp.lang.c)