Re: something to do with void *
- From: CBFalconer <cbfalconer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2005 18:43:35 GMT
Netocrat wrote:
>
.... snip ...
>
> Hmmm. I don't see any reason for void to be/have a value. Some
> expressions don't and shouldn't be forced to have values.
Something like 37 largely inane messages have flown by here
discussing this bit of metaphysics and code that nobody anywhere
near their right mind would write. How many *void*s can dance on a
single memory cell? Ridiculous. Is this going to die out or do I
need to PLONK the thread?
--
"If you want to post a followup via groups.google.com, don't use
the broken "Reply" link at the bottom of the article. Click on
"show options" at the top of the article, then click on the
"Reply" at the bottom of the article headers." - Keith Thompson
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: something to do with void *
- From: Tim Rentsch
- Re: something to do with void *
- References:
- something to do with void *
- From: maadhuu
- Re: something to do with void *
- From: Chris Dollin
- Re: something to do with void *
- From: Robert Gamble
- Re: something to do with void *
- From: Chris Dollin
- Re: something to do with void *
- From: Robert Gamble
- Re: something to do with void *
- From: Emmanuel Delahaye
- Re: something to do with void *
- From: Robert Gamble
- Re: something to do with void *
- From: Chris Dollin
- Re: something to do with void *
- From: Netocrat
- Re: something to do with void *
- From: Chris Dollin
- Re: something to do with void *
- From: Netocrat
- Re: something to do with void *
- From: Chris Dollin
- Re: something to do with void *
- From: Netocrat
- Re: something to do with void *
- From: Chris Dollin
- Re: something to do with void *
- From: Netocrat
- something to do with void *
- Prev by Date: Re: how a pointer to null works .
- Next by Date: Re: function without arithematic operator
- Previous by thread: Re: something to do with void *
- Next by thread: Re: something to do with void *
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|