Re: while (1) vs. for ( ;; )

Richard Heathfield <invalid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I'm quite unlikely to use multiple returns

Would you suppose that such a view is common in the world of
professional programming? My work experience is still quite limited,
and it's hard to tell ubiquitous programming conventions from
idiosyncratic oddities...

--
Christopher Benson-Manica | I *should* know what I'm talking about - if I
ataru(at)cyberspace.org | don't, I need to know. Flames welcome.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: while (1) vs. for ( ;; )
    ... >> I'm quite unlikely to use multiple returns ... > Would you suppose that such a view is common in the world of ... Prev by Date: ...
    (comp.lang.c)
  • Re: while (1) vs. for ( ;; )
    ... >>> I'm quite unlikely to use multiple returns ... >> Would you suppose that such a view is common in the world of ... >> professional programming? ...
    (comp.lang.c)
  • Re: while (1) vs. for ( ;; )
    ... people in the world of professional programming ... * multiple exit points from functions and loops ... > My work experience is still quite limited, ...
    (comp.lang.c)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard
    ... "CBFalconer" wrote in message ... >> That proves that you don't understand professional programming. ... > for multiple ... unreadable // and here we will not put the ending mark. ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard
    ... CBFalconer wrote: ... >>That proves that you don't understand professional programming. ... > for multiple ... EGA has been dead for a long time! ...
    (sci.crypt)