Re: Style isn't always religious
- From: rlb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Richard Bos)
- Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 15:49:12 GMT
Tim Rentsch <txr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The important thing is that he explained his metric. This
> particular metric may be somewhat person-dependent, and you
> might think it's not an especially good metric for measuring
> readability, but at least we know what it is.
>
> The problem with the response is it doesn't counter-propose
> a different metric. If all you say is "I don't find it
> readable", that moves the discussion in the direction of
> being more "religious".
It does? May I remark that I find your usage of the word "religious"
less than optimally readable?
Richard
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Style isn't always religious
- From: Tim Rentsch
- Re: Style isn't always religious
- References:
- what is difference between sizeof and strlen
- From: rahul8143
- Re: what is difference between sizeof and strlen
- From: Chris Dollin
- Style isn't always religious
- From: Tim Rentsch
- Re: Style isn't always religious
- From: Baxter
- Re: Style isn't always religious
- From: Richard Tobin
- Re: Style isn't always religious
- From: Tim Rentsch
- what is difference between sizeof and strlen
- Prev by Date: Re: object code from which compiler
- Next by Date: Re: Style isn't always religious
- Previous by thread: Re: Style isn't always religious
- Next by thread: Re: Style isn't always religious
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|