Re: while (1) vs. for ( ;; )
- From: "Default User" <defaultuserbr@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 Aug 2005 15:28:19 GMT
Richard Heathfield wrote:
> No. In my experience, people in the world of professional programming
> prefer:
>
> * enormous functions
> * multiple exit points from functions and loops
> * multiple entry points, if they can get them
> * spaghetti logic
> * tight coupling
> * vry shrt var nms
> * evnshrterfnnms
> * low cohesion
> * lots of debugging
> * hardly any testing
> * lots of maintenance
That's not been my experience.
Brian
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: while (1) vs. for ( ;; )
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: while (1) vs. for ( ;; )
- References:
- while (1) vs. for ( ;; )
- From: Michael B Allen
- Re: while (1) vs. for ( ;; )
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: while (1) vs. for ( ;; )
- From: Alan Balmer
- Re: while (1) vs. for ( ;; )
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: while (1) vs. for ( ;; )
- From: Christopher Benson-Manica
- Re: while (1) vs. for ( ;; )
- From: Richard Heathfield
- while (1) vs. for ( ;; )
- Prev by Date: Re: while (1) vs. for ( ;; )
- Next by Date: Re: How to free dynamically allocated array?
- Previous by thread: Re: while (1) vs. for ( ;; )
- Next by thread: Re: while (1) vs. for ( ;; )
- Index(es):