Re: low-level question
- From: SM Ryan <wyrmwif@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 23:10:56 -0000
# > 2. Explain in detail.
# > 3. How could you prevent this outcome without changing the code?
#
# You can't. With the code as is, it will always invoke undefined behavior. No
# wonder you couldn't get this on your midterm; it asks the impossible.
It's useful to have some idea of how to recognise and cope with
buggy code to help debug it.
--
SM Ryan http://www.rawbw.com/~wyrmwif/
I have no idea what you just said.
I get that alot.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: low-level question
- From: Keith Thompson
- Re: low-level question
- Prev by Date: Re: confused abt file operations
- Next by Date: Re: Is char*[] convertible to const char*[]?
- Previous by thread: Re: low-level question
- Next by thread: Re: low-level question
- Index(es):