Re: while (1) vs. for ( ;; )

"Default User" <defaultuserbr@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:3njtbgF1tua3U1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Richard Heathfield wrote:
>
> > Default User said:
> >
> > > Richard Heathfield wrote:
> > >
> > >> No. In my experience, people in the world of professional
> > programming >> prefer:
> > >>
> > >> * enormous functions
> > >> * multiple exit points from functions and loops
> > >> * multiple entry points, if they can get them
> > >> * spaghetti logic
> > >> * tight coupling
> > >> * vry shrt var nms
> > >> * evnshrterfnnms
> > >> * low cohesion
> > >> * lots of debugging
> > >> * hardly any testing
> > >> * lots of maintenance
> > >
> > >
> > > That's not been my experience.
> >
> > You've been a very lucky chap. (And, on occasion, so have I.)
>
> Perhaps luck in that the software here has generally been written to
> Common Coding Standards (if ERT opposes it, it must be good) which
> either forbid or recommend against most of the things on your list.
> Naturally, debugging, testing, and maintenance are different, not
> really things controlled by a standard.

Would you mind posting these ?
Coding Standards so effective would be very helpful around here.

Chqrlie.


.