Re: Why C/C++ errors are SO obscure/devious??
- From: Eric Sosman <eric.sosman@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 14:07:05 -0400
Massimo Soricetti wrote:
> [...]
> Why can't a compiler give more accurate informations about errors?
> Shouldn't this save time, stress and money?
> [...]
> What are your opinions on this matter?
First, that you are well-intentioned. Second, though, that
you have but little grasp of the issues and no understanding
of the difficulties. Third, that spending some time in forums
like comp.compilers might give you some insights.
--
Eric.Sosman@xxxxxxx
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why C/C++ errors are SO obscure/devious??
- From: Massimo Soricetti
- Re: Why C/C++ errors are SO obscure/devious??
- References:
- Why C/C++ errors are SO obscure/devious??
- From: Massimo Soricetti
- Why C/C++ errors are SO obscure/devious??
- Prev by Date: Re: Why C/C++ errors are SO obscure/devious??
- Next by Date: Re: Style isn't always religious
- Previous by thread: Re: Why C/C++ errors are SO obscure/devious??
- Next by thread: Re: Why C/C++ errors are SO obscure/devious??
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|