Re: Greater sensitivity to off-topic than in other comp.lang
- From: gazelle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Kenny McCormack)
- Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 12:12:16 GMT
In article <hJcRe.5398$z2.2355@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Mike Wahler <mkwahler@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>"E. Robert Tisdale" <E.Robert.Tisdale@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>news:df2hcj$8oc$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Johan Borkhuis wrote:
>>
>>> The definition of the comp.lang.c newsgroup is clear and has been clear
>>> for a long time: it is about standard C, nothing more and nothing less.
>>
>> Where is it written?
>
>http://www.ungerhu.com/jxh/clc.welcome.txt
>
>-Mike
I don't think anyone doubts that the (ridiculous) definition is in place,
and enforced (by the regs).
The question is, does it make any sense? Is it desirable?
.
- References:
- Re: Greater sensitivity to off-topic than in other comp.lang
- From: Mike Wahler
- Re: Greater sensitivity to off-topic than in other comp.lang
- Prev by Date: Re: Detect if stdin is via keyboard or via < file?
- Next by Date: Re: Why C/C++ errors are SO obscure/devious??
- Previous by thread: Re: Greater sensitivity to off-topic than in other comp.lang
- Next by thread: Baffled by this ... (casting of function pointers)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|