Re: is there a way to do this...


Keith Thompson wrote:
> sumit1680@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
> > well just for interest sake! i am told this is possible without threads
> > and the answer is predictable!
> > but the catch is that it is architecture predictable.
> >
> > and for all who r concerned with " void " before main... consider " int
> > " if u like so.agreed to the fact that main returns int, not void.
> > pls dwell upon the question not its discrepancies.
>
> Some friendly advice.
thanks for the same, its second time you are pointing me the same..
>
> Don't assume that your readers can see the article to which you're
> replying. Provide some context and proper attributions.
>
> If you want to post a followup via groups.google.com, don't use
> the broken "Reply" link at the bottom of the article. Click on
> "show options" at the top of the article, then click on the
> "Reply" at the bottom of the article headers.
>
> Don't use abbreviations like "u" for "you" or "r" for "are". They
> just make it harder to read what you write.
>
ok ... i will try my best to avoid the same ....
> Follow the newsgroup for a while (or browse the archives) and
> understand the conventions we use around here.
>
> --
> Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@xxxxxxx <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
> San Diego Supercomputer Center <*> <http://users.sdsc.edu/~kst>
> We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this.

.

Relevant Pages