Re: Assembler vs Compiler vs Linker
- From: Michael Mair <Michael.Mair@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 12:20:03 +0200
Sunil wrote:
This newsgroup only deals with the C language
yes you are right.This news group deals with C Language. But i think before knowing what is there in C language knowing what is the purpose of it is more important.
Since C is a compiler , i think i have posted question in the correct group.
1) Please do quote context in a way that it is clear you are quoting 2) Please do not snip attributions when quoting
Without context and attributions you make it harder for people who have not (yet) received all previous messages to help you as they do not know what you are referring to and how the discussion developed.
3) You did not check wikipedia on compilers: C is not a compiler. There are C compilers but an implementation could work without compiling. (The difference between C being a compiler and there being compilers compiling C is the same as between all water being rivers and having rivers containing water.)
You did not read the FAQ or the Welcome Message (both can easily be found using google), so your opinion is unnecessarily uninformed and wrong.
-Michael -- E-Mail: Mine is an /at/ gmx /dot/ de address. .
- References:
- Assembler vs Compiler vs Linker
- From: Sunil
- Re: Assembler vs Compiler vs Linker
- From: Michael Mair
- Re: Assembler vs Compiler vs Linker
- From: Sunil
- Assembler vs Compiler vs Linker
- Prev by Date: Re: offsetof
- Next by Date: Re: offsetof
- Previous by thread: Re: Assembler vs Compiler vs Linker
- Next by thread: Re: Assembler vs Compiler vs Linker
- Index(es):