Re: what does global char x[][444] mean?
- From: "Prafulla Harpanhalli" <prafulla_ng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 Oct 2005 05:45:59 -0800
<OT, absolutely>
Chris Torek wrote:
<snipped>
It was some 2 years ago that i started closely following your posts on
clc. With my C programming skills being just knee high, i have to
re-read your posts again and again to actually make out the point you
are trying to make. And at the end of it, its enlightenment for me.
Seriously.
I am reminded of a request by another clc regular more than a decade
ago. He was interested to know if you ever considered writing a book on
C programming. To which you had replied citing your reasons for your
decision. I wish you had considered writing a book.
Anyway, i collect your posts and have a nice collection of some of the
finest mails explaining some basic C fundamentals which most of us
newcomers stumble upon.. and which form a topics for discussion when me
and my friends meet.
The thing that helps me most is what you had once pointed out, "most
problems have a lot of unncessary details. Big thing lies in removing
the unwanted stuff and thinking about the actual problem." I realise
that i missed the most basics of problem solving..
Regards,
Prafulla Harpanhalli
</OT, absolutely>
.
- References:
- Re: what does global char x[][444] mean?
- From: Niu Xiao
- Re: what does global char x[][444] mean?
- Prev by Date: Re: "a < b < c" not the same as "(a < b) && (b < c)"?
- Next by Date: Re: pls expand this macro
- Previous by thread: Re: what does global char x[][444] mean?
- Next by thread: Re: ruminations on #include and paths
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|