Re: gets() - dangerous?
- From: Keith Thompson <kst-u@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 23:17:05 GMT
"Malcolm" <regniztar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> "Kenny McCormack" <gazelle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
>> [some stuff]
> [some more stuff]
Please stop feeding the troll. Thank you.
--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@xxxxxxx <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
San Diego Supercomputer Center <*> <http://users.sdsc.edu/~kst>
We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this.
.
- References:
- gets() - dangerous?
- From: Lee
- Re: gets() - dangerous?
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: gets() - dangerous?
- From: Kenny McCormack
- Re: gets() - dangerous?
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: gets() - dangerous?
- From: Kenny McCormack
- Re: gets() - dangerous?
- From: Malcolm
- gets() - dangerous?
- Prev by Date: Re: memcpy junk at beginning of buffer
- Next by Date: Re: memcpy junk at beginning of buffer
- Previous by thread: Re: gets() - dangerous?
- Next by thread: Re: gets() - dangerous?
- Index(es):