Re: Input-line reverser
- From: Richard Heathfield <invalid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 18:10:30 +0000 (UTC)
Mike Wahler said:
>
> "Richard Heathfield" <invalid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:dp2dp4$8qv$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> The reason it's not a valid C program is that it attempts to modify
>
> evaluate, not modify. Modifying (i.e. assigning to it) would be OK.
I plead the rest of my original sentence as justification.
>> the
>> value of an object, when that object hasn't been given a value yet.
--
Richard Heathfield
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29/7/1999
http://www.cpax.org.uk
email: rjh at above domain (but drop the www, obviously)
.
- References:
- Input-line reverser
- From: Albert
- Re: Input-line reverser
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: Input-line reverser
- From: Albert
- Re: Input-line reverser
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: Input-line reverser
- From: Mike Wahler
- Input-line reverser
- Prev by Date: Re: really terrible
- Next by Date: Re: void * pointer convert problem.
- Previous by thread: Re: Input-line reverser
- Next by thread: Re: Input-line reverser
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|