Re: Input-line reverser
- From: "Mike Wahler" <mkwahler@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 00:06:22 GMT
"Mark McIntyre" <markmcintyre@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:g5ibr111ajddk27gbggg7u93fhum2pegh1@xxxxxxxxxx
> On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 15:26:25 GMT, in comp.lang.c , "Mike Wahler"
> <mkwahler@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Richard Heathfield" <invalid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>
>>> The reason it's not a valid C program is that it attempts to modify
>>
>>evaluate, not modify. Modifying (i.e. assigning to it) would be OK
>
> Not all modification is assignment. Consider if the modification were
> for example ++ or +=.
Both those operators evaluate their operands.
-Mike
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Input-line reverser
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: Input-line reverser
- From: Mark McIntyre
- Re: Input-line reverser
- References:
- Input-line reverser
- From: Albert
- Re: Input-line reverser
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: Input-line reverser
- From: Albert
- Re: Input-line reverser
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: Input-line reverser
- From: Mike Wahler
- Re: Input-line reverser
- From: Mark McIntyre
- Input-line reverser
- Prev by Date: Structure size and binary format
- Next by Date: Re: Structure size and binary format
- Previous by thread: Re: Input-line reverser
- Next by thread: Re: Input-line reverser
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|