Re: Input-line reverser
- From: Mark McIntyre <markmcintyre@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 00:31:00 +0000
On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 00:06:22 GMT, in comp.lang.c , "Mike Wahler"
<mkwahler@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>"Mark McIntyre" <markmcintyre@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>news:g5ibr111ajddk27gbggg7u93fhum2pegh1@xxxxxxxxxx
>> On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 15:26:25 GMT, in comp.lang.c , "Mike Wahler"
>> <mkwahler@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"Richard Heathfield" <invalid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>>
>>>> The reason it's not a valid C program is that it attempts to modify
>>>
>>>evaluate, not modify. Modifying (i.e. assigning to it) would be OK
>>
>> Not all modification is assignment. Consider if the modification were
>> for example ++ or +=.
>
>Both those operators evaluate their operands.
Agreed. My point was that you said, still visible above, that
modifying would be ok since it is the same as assigning. This isn't
correct.
Mark McIntyre
--
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
.
- References:
- Input-line reverser
- From: Albert
- Re: Input-line reverser
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: Input-line reverser
- From: Albert
- Re: Input-line reverser
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: Input-line reverser
- From: Mike Wahler
- Re: Input-line reverser
- From: Mark McIntyre
- Re: Input-line reverser
- From: Mike Wahler
- Input-line reverser
- Prev by Date: Re: Structure size and binary format
- Next by Date: Re: a big problem
- Previous by thread: Re: Input-line reverser
- Next by thread: Re: Input-line reverser
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|