Re: segfault w/ block, but not file scope
- From: "M.B" <mbpradeep@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 8 Jan 2006 21:20:30 -0800
Keith Thompson wrote:
> "M.B" <mbpradeep@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > Chuck F. wrote:
> >> M.B wrote:
> >> > sorry if thjis is a duplicate reply...
> >> >
> >> > I guess this is a scope issue for variable "namelist" I suggest
> >> > to change the function int getFileName(char *,struct dirent
> >> > ***); and make necessary changes to code. it may work fine
> >> >
> >> > bcoz scandir i guess sets "struct dirent **" itself. if its
> >> > global all is fine, but local variables 0 its problem-same as
> >> > pass by value
> >>
> >> Please use English, not dudespeak, in this newsgroup, and include
> >> adequate context. Between the two your article is totally
> >> meaningless. See below for further advice.
> >
> > For letting out context, my mistake sorry.
> > English - hope this is not an english literature group. People want
> > answers and its enough if they get those in anyway. go hell with
> > correct English.
>
> You don't need to write flawless English, especially if it doesn't
> happen to be your native language, but avoiding abbreviations like "u"
> for "you" and "bcoz" for "because" make it *much* easier to understand
> you.
Too many SMS s . I will try
>
> > Also please check if the advice given in your signature works
> > correctly.
>
> As far as I know it does. Are you saying it doesn't?
Not for me (and i dont know why).
>
> > And finally, noone has time and patience to reply to trolls.
>
> Chuck F. is not a troll. Trust me on this.
I know. Chuck F and others, I apologise
>
> --
> Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@xxxxxxx <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
> San Diego Supercomputer Center <*> <http://users.sdsc.edu/~kst>
> We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this.
.
- References:
- segfault w/ block, but not file scope
- From: Dieter
- Re: segfault w/ block, but not file scope
- From: Dieter
- Re: segfault w/ block, but not file scope
- From: Jack Klein
- Re: segfault w/ block, but not file scope
- From: Dieter
- Re: segfault w/ block, but not file scope
- From: Chuck F.
- Re: segfault w/ block, but not file scope
- From: M.B
- Re: segfault w/ block, but not file scope
- From: Chuck F.
- Re: segfault w/ block, but not file scope
- From: M.B
- Re: segfault w/ block, but not file scope
- From: Keith Thompson
- segfault w/ block, but not file scope
- Prev by Date: Re: using virtual function in c
- Next by Date: Re: Bit shifts and endianness
- Previous by thread: Re: segfault w/ block, but not file scope
- Next by thread: Re: segfault w/ block, but not file scope
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|