Why We Use C Than C++...
- From: "sonugeetha@xxxxxxxxx" <sonugeetha@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 12 Jan 2006 03:14:04 -0800
Hi, Please help me in this regard...
All the kernel level programs are written in C... (i.e: Open Source
LINUX)... Why are they not using C++... I personally feel that C++ is
more easy to code than C... When i searched in our encyclopedia (i.e
Google), i came up with several answers, telling "C is much faster than
C++ and most kernal prgms uses only C" ... But why is it so...? Why
they use C for these OS based programs.. Please Help me with detailed
explanation...
Cheers,
Balaji Jayaraman...
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why We Use C Than C++...
- From: Emmanuel Delahaye
- Re: Why We Use C Than C++...
- From: Malcolm
- Re: Why We Use C Than C++...
- From: pemo
- Re: Why We Use C Than C++...
- From: Ian
- Re: Why We Use C Than C++...
- From: Ulrich Eckhardt
- Re: Why We Use C Than C++...
- From: James S. Singleton
- Re: Why We Use C Than C++...
- From: Andrew Poelstra
- Re: Why We Use C Than C++...
- From: Walter Roberson
- Re: Why We Use C Than C++...
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: Why We Use C Than C++...
- From: EventHelix.com
- Re: Why We Use C Than C++...
- Prev by Date: Re: Is there a C certificate?
- Next by Date: Re: Why We Use C Than C++...
- Previous by thread: Character space allocation
- Next by thread: Re: Why We Use C Than C++...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|