Re: Why We Use C Than C++...
- From: henryk.mueller@xxxxxx
- Date: 13 Jan 2006 04:45:30 -0800
Sorry, I used the wrong word *sophisticated*. A better word is
*elegant*.
And you are right. You can do the same thing in C as in C++. But it's
not build in! You have to code it first - like virtual functions,
inheritance, overloading and stuff...
Ok, and then write me a working equivalent to the C++ template
mechanism... ;o)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why We Use C Than C++...
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: Why We Use C Than C++...
- References:
- Why We Use C Than C++...
- From: sonugeetha@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Why We Use C Than C++...
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: Why We Use C Than C++...
- From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav
- Re: Why We Use C Than C++...
- From: henryk . mueller
- Re: Why We Use C Than C++...
- From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav
- Re: Why We Use C Than C++...
- From: henryk . mueller
- Re: Why We Use C Than C++...
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Why We Use C Than C++...
- Prev by Date: Re: Linking statically
- Next by Date: Re: embedded questions!!!
- Previous by thread: Re: Why We Use C Than C++...
- Next by thread: Re: Why We Use C Than C++...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|