Re: Why We Use C Than C++...
- From: August Karlstrom <fusionfive@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:47:30 GMT
Richard Heathfield wrote:
A good C++ class (or C module) should be like a duck - calm and smooth on the surface, and paddling furiously underneath. Clean interfaces are much to be preferred to "sophisticated" interfaces. "Sophisticated" is just another word for "hard to use and therefore bug-prone".
Love the duck metaphor, LOL.
Aesthetic appreciation is notoriously non-portable.
Not in a high level implementation using multi platform libraries.
August
-- I am the "ILOVEGNU" signature virus. Just copy me to your signature. This email was infected under the terms of the GNU General Public License. .
- References:
- Why We Use C Than C++...
- From: sonugeetha@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Why We Use C Than C++...
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: Why We Use C Than C++...
- From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav
- Re: Why We Use C Than C++...
- From: henryk . mueller
- Re: Why We Use C Than C++...
- From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav
- Re: Why We Use C Than C++...
- From: henryk . mueller
- Re: Why We Use C Than C++...
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Why We Use C Than C++...
- Prev by Date: Re: embedded questions!!!
- Next by Date: Re: Why We Use C Than C++...
- Previous by thread: Re: Why We Use C Than C++...
- Next by thread: Re: Why We Use C Than C++...
- Index(es):