Re: Why We Use C Than C++...

henryk.mueller@xxxxxx said:

> Sorry, I used the wrong word *sophisticated*. A better word is
> *elegant*.

Fair enough.

> And you are right. You can do the same thing in C as in C++. But it's
> not build in! You have to code it first - like virtual functions,
> inheritance, overloading and stuff...

Why would you want any of *that*? If I wanted that stuff, I'd be using C++!

> Ok, and then write me a working equivalent to the C++ template
> mechanism... ;o)

Why bother?

--
Richard Heathfield
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29/7/1999
http://www.cpax.org.uk
email: rjh at above domain (but drop the www, obviously)
.

Relevant Pages