Re: c.l.c wiki update
- From: Randy Howard <randyhoward@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 02:52:10 GMT
Dieter wrote
(in article <5ridnWztOdSdE0jeRVn-gg@xxxxxxxxxxx>):
> Netocrat wrote:
> [snip]
>>
>> Any c.l.c reader is a potential editor, so some newsgroup discussion prior
>> to making a decision helps us make sure it's an appropriate one.
>>
>
> Two things:
>
> 1) Should all code examples be compilable? If this consideration hasn't
> already been established, I'd like to suggest each example given _should
> be_ compilable for the sake of clarity.
>
> 2) I, like others, am very interested in the progress, direction and
> discussion of the clc-wiki, therefore I request a new thread started for
> this sole purpose. Digging back in my newsreader, through 275 posts of
> the "gets()-dangerous?" thread, is a hassle.
I suggest discussion of it on the wiki itself instead.
--
Randy Howard (2reply remove FOOBAR)
"The power of accurate observation is called cynicism by those
who have not got it." - George Bernard Shaw
How 'bout them Horns?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: c.l.c wiki update
- From: Netocrat
- Re: c.l.c wiki update
- References:
- Re: c.l.c wiki update
- From: Netocrat
- Re: c.l.c wiki update
- From: Al Balmer
- Re: c.l.c wiki update
- From: Netocrat
- Re: c.l.c wiki update
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: c.l.c wiki update
- From: pete
- Re: c.l.c wiki update
- From: Netocrat
- Re: c.l.c wiki update
- From: Michael Wojcik
- Re: c.l.c wiki update
- From: Netocrat
- Re: c.l.c wiki update
- From: Dieter
- Re: c.l.c wiki update
- Prev by Date: Printf problem with big numbers....
- Next by Date: Re: Printf problem with big numbers....
- Previous by thread: Re: c.l.c wiki update
- Next by thread: Re: c.l.c wiki update
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|