Re: Casting return value to fit within constraints of error values (portability)
- From: Mark McIntyre <markmcintyre@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2006 12:06:58 +0000
On 27 Jan 2006 20:57:31 -0800, in comp.lang.c , "clayne"
<clayne@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> ssize_t read(int fildes, void *buf, size_t nbyte);
you /are/ aware that read() is offtopic here? Its a posix function,
probably best discussed in a unix group.
Mark McIntyre
--
"Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are,
by definition, not smart enough to debug it."
--Brian Kernighan
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
.
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: advantage of using typedefs
- Next by Date: Re: embedded questions!!!
- Previous by thread: Re: Casting return value to fit within constraints of error values (portability)
- Next by thread: Re: Casting return value to fit within constraints of error values (portability)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
