Re: Segmentation fault!


"Keith Thompson" <kst-u@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:lnfympwlw1.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
[...]
Rod, a personal observation: your recent postings here have actually
been reasonable.

My posts were reasonable in the beginning too, until 'off topic' abuse
killed every conversation here. You and a supportive group of cronies were
a prime factor in this.

Have you decided not to be an abusive troll?

Reasons: A to K.

A) Time constraints, I can't post to everything, 24 hours a day, like some
people.
B) Others, who exhibited troll like behavior, have slowed their non-relevant
posts.
C) A number of people who hadn't been posting started posting after
recognizing valid C questions buried beneath 'off topic' C questions.
D) I'm ignoring Mark McIntyre, since I don't 'get' his perspective AND he
seems uninterested in C.
E) I'm laughing heavily _with_ Kenny McCormack, although he doesn't
contribute to C conversation either. His humor reduces the sharpness of
some people's comments.
F) You haven't read some of the junk threads.
G) The poster of the 'mental abuse' thread was a 'dead ringer' for a cousin
who is clinically schizoid and refuses medication. The exception being, he
usually also discusses flying dragons. It was then, I realized you might
not be so off...
H) You went on a two and half day temper tantrum, posting to every thread in
sight, and are now down to two troll-ish "off topic" comments per day. Keep
it up, er, I mean down.
I) Being a self-proclaimed C god, I wanted to see if you'd post anything of
interest to P.J.Plauger or Doug Gwyn. You didn't. You could have asked
them about anything...
J) This post, to one of the fork() threads, never made it:
I noticed you didn't tell P.J. Plauger in the "fork implementation"
thread that he was off topic... Why is that? Double standard,
perhaps? You defer to "authority," but expect others to defer
to your "authority"...
K) I remembered there are many Thompson's in my Mother's side of the
family... (I'm not joking.)


Rod Pemberton


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: For the Massechisettianiters
    ... >>>I'd strongly advise you to stop posting that. ... And I changed it again today, as I do most days, for reasons which you ... You should consider the wisdom of using Usenet at all. ... >You do not get to RESERVE THE RIGHT to threaten me with injury, slander, ...
    (misc.fitness.weights)
  • Re: Heterophobes aka SPP Criminal Stalking Ring
    ... :>: Concrete evidence that the psychopaths stalking you and everyone ... :>: containing text I authored and sent for posting in one of the many ... with my ex-inlaws based on many personal reasons. ... Iceman, now there is a name I haven't heard of for a very long time, are ...
    (sci.psychology.psychotherapy)
  • Re: Heterophobes aka SPP Criminal Stalking Ring
    ... :> sexuality? ... :>: containing text I authored and sent for posting in one of the many ... with my ex-inlaws based on many personal reasons. ... Linda if you can prove that they have put my tax records up on the ...
    (sci.psychology.psychotherapy)
  • Re: email newsletters in Publisher 2003
    ... And my reasons for replying and my methods of replying are entirely my own. ... It is never my intention to be rude, ... I can't tell you what is in the next version of Publisher, ... Search before posting your question. ...
    (microsoft.public.publisher)
  • Re: Beseler enlarger questions
    ... >avoids sifting through the typical over-quoting that people tend to ... >>top posting fixed to maintain the flow of the discussion. ... One of the reasons Usenet has managed to grow to be what it is ... is that the original concepts were very well ...
    (alt.photography)