Re: Typedef or not

On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 17:59:39 +0530, Ravi Uday wrote:

Ronny Mandal wrote:

Consider these two:

Typedef struct { int foo, int bar } FooBar;

^^^ - added

You corrected a non-error ("int a, b" is fine although "int a, b;" is
preferred) and did not correct the error (Typedef != typedef).

--
Ben.
.

References:
- Typedef or not
  - From: Ronny Mandal
- Re: Typedef or not
  - From: Ravi Uday

Relevant Pages

Re: how to define a function pointer variable witout typdef?
... > typedef name, the entity is an alias ... > typedef int foo; ... I think that a complete structure declaration: ... struct list_node *next; ...
(comp.lang.c)
Re: Typedef or not
... Typedef struct {int foo, int bar} FooBar; ...
(comp.lang.c)
Re: Typedef or not
... typedef struct FooBar; ... struct FooBar fb, *pfb? ... typedef you refer to the type as "FooBar", ...
(comp.lang.c)
Re: Like Typedef(In C++) operation what is option in C#.
... There's no project-wide equivalent of typedef. ... You can use using directives on a per file basis, ... using FooBar = System.Console; ...
(microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.csharp)