Re: Typedef or not
- From: Micah Cowan <micah@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 21:10:18 GMT
Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 17:59:39 +0530, Ravi Uday wrote:
Ronny Mandal wrote:
Consider these two:^^^ - added
Typedef struct { int foo, int bar } FooBar;
You corrected a non-error ("int a, b" is fine although "int a, b;" is
preferred) and did not correct the error (Typedef != typedef).
Actually, the semicolon is required, even in C99.
Also, Ravi: please avoid using tab characters: the quoting prefixes
have now skewed your post.
.
- References:
- Typedef or not
- From: Ronny Mandal
- Re: Typedef or not
- From: Ravi Uday
- Re: Typedef or not
- From: Ben Bacarisse
- Typedef or not
- Prev by Date: Re: Hellp with type promotion
- Next by Date: Re: Help in c pointers
- Previous by thread: Re: Typedef or not
- Next by thread: Re: Typedef or not
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|