Re: Need suggestions for C links.
- From: CBFalconer <cbfalconer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2006 15:48:14 -0500
Richard Bos wrote:
"MrG{DRGN}" <Iamnot@xxxxxxxx> wrote:.... snip ...
Why did they decide to use a *expletive deleted* PDF file? It
may just be my opinion, but I think that html file(s) would be
much more easily navigated.
For one, HTML is a pain in the backside to print (and yes,
occasionally you do want to print excerpts). For another, HTML
looks differently on IE, on FireFox, Opera, whatever - and how
are you going to display the formulae used in, e.g., the
definition of the floating point formats, in Lynx? Remember,
this is an official Standard - clarity is important, and
confusion undesirable.
Properly constructed HTML adapts to the output page (or screen)
size, and thus is much more easily printed than something rigidly
fixed such as a PDF file.
--
"If you want to post a followup via groups.google.com, don't use
the broken "Reply" link at the bottom of the article. Click on
"show options" at the top of the article, then click on the
"Reply" at the bottom of the article headers." - Keith Thompson
More details at: <http://cfaj.freeshell.org/google/>
Also see <http://www.safalra.com/special/googlegroupsreply/>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Need suggestions for C links.
- From: Mark McIntyre
- Re: Need suggestions for C links.
- From: Micah Cowan
- Re: Need suggestions for C links.
- Prev by Date: Re: GCC time.h problem.
- Next by Date: Re: Wrap up Text
- Previous by thread: Re: Need suggestions for C links.
- Next by thread: Re: Need suggestions for C links.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|