Re: Boost process and C
- From: CBFalconer <cbfalconer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 16:03:13 -0400
jacob navia wrote:
CBFalconer a écrit :.... snip ...
There was never any indication of revision levels, except
that suddenly the debugger no longer worked at all, it just crashed
immediately (it apparently suddenly used Pentium only instructions,
without bothering to check what it was running on).
Mr Falconer insisted that I keep lcc-win32 compatible with his 486
system. I refused without a maintenance contract, and he did not
forgive me that to this day.
Don't lie. I never insisted on anything. You were totally unaware
of a problem, due to lack of testing. I simply abandoned the
system, and have never recommended it since.
You will note that M.Navia does not want to hear about bugs.
--
"Churchill and Bush can both be considered wartime leaders, just
as Secretariat and Mr Ed were both horses." - James Rhodes.
"We have always known that heedless self-interest was bad
morals. We now know that it is bad economics" - FDR
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Boost process and C
- Next by Date: Re: First program in C - what is going on with function returns?
- Previous by thread: Re: Boost process and C
- Next by thread: Re: Boost process and C
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|