Re: Boost process and C
- From: Ben Pfaff <blp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 01 May 2006 12:45:35 -0700
websnarf@xxxxxxxxx writes:
You are saying you should throw out an entire language because you
don't like the way it handles strings?
It depends on your priorities. I wouldn't want to rewrite a Perl
program that does complex string processing in C. It's going to
get a lot longer and possibly harder to read (depending on how
much taste the Perl programmer had).
--
"We put [the best] Assembler programmers in a little glass case in the hallway
near the Exit sign. The sign on the case says, `In case of optimization
problem, break glass.' Meanwhile, the problem solvers are busy doing their
work in languages most appropriate to the job at hand." --Richard Riehle
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Boost process and C
- From: jacob navia
- Re: Boost process and C
- References:
- Re: Boost process and C
- From: websnarf
- Re: Boost process and C
- Prev by Date: Messaging and GCC - "use of `mktemp' is dangerous" warning
- Next by Date: Re: Casting void * to void ** ?
- Previous by thread: Re: Boost process and C
- Next by thread: Re: Boost process and C
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|