Re: iostream error.

Keith Thompson wrote:
Martin Ambuhl <mambuhl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

Ian Collins wrote:

Look agian.
My comments where
"No he shouldn't, the correct file is <iostream>"
and the setting of a follow-up to c.l.c++
So I had already corrected the bogus advice and directed the thread
to
the appropriate place.

That explains it. You are an idiot who does not understand how usenet
works.


Martin, you accused Ian Collins of offering bogus advice. In fact, he
*corrected* the bogus advice that someone else had offered, and you
have not acknowledged your own error. Whatever else Ian may have
done, I suggest that there's more than enough blame to go around here.

Thank you, Keith. My erro was in supposing that Ian Collins, in calling my post "superfluous" was somehow involved in the same thread. His (which he only quoted in this latest message) was a parallel post. It did not appear as anything to which I responded or as a parent of anything to which I responded. He gave no reason for asserting that my response was "superfluous". The text he quoted above appears in no post to which I responded, or in any parent of such a post. There is no particular reason for me to acknowledge any error than assuming that he had any clue about how usenet works. His completely rude and unwarranted assertion that my post was "superfluous" with no indication of why shows him to be an ignorant boor. There is no reason for me to chase down his parallel posting to determine why he decided to belittle mine.


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: iostream error.
    ... you accused Ian Collins of offering bogus advice. ... no particular reason for me to acknowledge any error than assuming ... In a post that was a direct followup to a post by Ian Collins, ...
    (comp.lang.c)
  • Re: iostream error.
    ... Keith Thompson wrote: ... you accused Ian Collins of offering bogus advice. ... an unnecessarily rude response form Martin to another response of mine ...
    (comp.lang.c)