Re: iostream error.
- From: Martin Ambuhl <mambuhl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 05 May 2006 21:55:14 GMT
Keith Thompson wrote:
In a post that was a direct followup to a post by Ian Collins, you wrote:
| It is not superfluous for me to note that your 'advice' was not only
| off-topic but *wrong*. For God's sake, if you want to post
| off-topic answers, at least be close to being right.
This is in response to his sticking in a completely unwarranted statement that my post was "superfluous." Nowhere in the thread leading to it did Ian ever appear, nor did Ian ever indicate why my post was "superflyous." There was no reason that someone who posted a parallel response would be rudely intruding. He didn't even have the decency to tell me that the reason that my post was "superfluous" was that he had preempted the field in a parallel post, and he now owned the newsgroup.
It's reasonable to assume that you were addressing Ian directly,
Of course I addressed Ian directly. That I mistook him for someone who would not claim that a parallel, unreferenced message by him made all other responses "superfluous" was my error. He obviously is very rude and he obviously has no clue how newsgroups work. Why the hell are you in this at all?
.
- References:
- iostream error.
- From: Prasad
- Re: iostream error.
- From: Neroku
- Re: iostream error.
- From: Martin Ambuhl
- Re: iostream error.
- From: Ian Collins
- Re: iostream error.
- From: Martin Ambuhl
- Re: iostream error.
- From: Ian Collins
- Re: iostream error.
- From: Martin Ambuhl
- Re: iostream error.
- From: Keith Thompson
- Re: iostream error.
- From: Martin Ambuhl
- Re: iostream error.
- From: Keith Thompson
- iostream error.
- Prev by Date: Re: The void** pointer breaking symmetry?
- Next by Date: Re: The void** pointer breaking symmetry?
- Previous by thread: Re: iostream error.
- Next by thread: Re: iostream error.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|