Re: iostream error.

Keith Thompson wrote:
Martin Ambuhl <mambuhl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

Ian Collins wrote:

Look agian.
My comments where
"No he shouldn't, the correct file is <iostream>"
and the setting of a follow-up to c.l.c++
So I had already corrected the bogus advice and directed the thread
to
the appropriate place.

That explains it. You are an idiot who does not understand how usenet
works.


Martin, you accused Ian Collins of offering bogus advice. In fact, he
*corrected* the bogus advice that someone else had offered, and you
have not acknowledged your own error. Whatever else Ian may have
done, I suggest that there's more than enough blame to go around here.

Thank you Keith.

I probably shouldn't have started this in the first place, I'd just read
an unnecessarily rude response form Martin to another response of mine
on another thread and couldn't resist the obvious error.

I also strongly object to people on Usenet using nouns like 'idiot' for
people they don't know.

--
Ian Collins.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: iostream error.
    ... Keith Thompson wrote: ... you accused Ian Collins of offering bogus advice. ... He gave no reason for asserting that my response was "superfluous". ... There is no particular reason for me to acknowledge any error than assuming that he had any clue about how usenet works. ...
    (comp.lang.c)
  • Re: iostream error.
    ... you accused Ian Collins of offering bogus advice. ... no particular reason for me to acknowledge any error than assuming ... In a post that was a direct followup to a post by Ian Collins, ...
    (comp.lang.c)