Re: speed of execution
- From: cri@xxxxxxxx (Richard Harter)
- Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 11:33:19 GMT
On Fri, 19 May 2006 08:11:53 -0700, "osmium" <r124c4u102@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
"Richard Harter" writes:[snip]
In short, your comment was an overstatement.
Thanks for clarifying that. I'll bet there is a lots more traffic now than
there was in 1982?
Likely enough. There has been an enormous expansion of usenet traffic
since then, but not so much in the C newsgroup. I opine that the
difference in traffic between net.lang.c in the 80's and comp.lang.c
now is about a factor of two or three.
Society depends on vigilant, public-spirited people like you to keep the
rest of us on the straight and narrow. Keep up the good work!
Thank you for your kind words and your thoughtful consideration. I
have every confidence that you will reform your ways.
Richard Harter, cri@xxxxxxxx
http://home.tiac.net/~cri, http://www.varinoma.com
It is not wise to examine apparent coincidences too closely.
Sometimes they are not coincidences at all.
.
- References:
- speed of execution
- From: kavi
- Re: speed of execution
- From: Richard Harter
- speed of execution
- Prev by Date: Re: String move Macro.
- Next by Date: Re: speed of execution
- Previous by thread: Re: speed of execution
- Next by thread: Re: speed of execution
- Index(es):