Re: Simplicity has a future
- From: Flash Gordon <spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 08:38:39 +0100
Ben Pfaff wrote:
"Tomas" <No.Email@Address> writes:
Richard Heathfield posted:
foo *foo_create(int bar)A facility as simple as "find and replace" solves the keyword problem.
{
foo *new = malloc(sizeof *new);
if(new != NULL)
{
new->bar = bar;
}
return new;
}
specifically to remind me, should I ever try to use a C++ compiler on
the code, that I'm making a big mistake.
Yes, and at the same time it screws up all the comments that use
"new" as an English word.
Or even worse messages that are output to the user.
Please enter then newobject price:
--
Flash Gordon, living in interesting times.
Web site - http://home.flash-gordon.me.uk/
comp.lang.c posting guidelines and intro:
http://clc-wiki.net/wiki/Intro_to_clc
.
- References:
- Simplicity has a future
- From: jacob navia
- Re: Simplicity has a future
- From: Tomás
- Re: Simplicity has a future
- From: jacob navia
- Re: Simplicity has a future
- From: Tomás
- Re: Simplicity has a future
- From: Keith Thompson
- Re: Simplicity has a future
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: Simplicity has a future
- From: Tomás
- Re: Simplicity has a future
- From: Ben Pfaff
- Simplicity has a future
- Prev by Date: Re: lower number
- Next by Date: Re: problem with size of
- Previous by thread: Re: Simplicity has a future
- Next by thread: Re: Simplicity has a future
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|