Re: Simplicity has a future
- From: rlb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Richard Bos)
- Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 13:18:40 GMT
"Vladimir Oka" <novine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Richard Heathfield wrote:
Anyone C programmer having trouble understanding the code would probably
have trouble understanding "Winnie the Pooh".
You underestimate the depths of Winnie the Pooh!
Especially in the original Latin.
Richard
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Simplicity has a future
- From: Default User
- Re: Simplicity has a future
- References:
- Simplicity has a future
- From: jacob navia
- Re: Simplicity has a future
- From: Marc Boyer
- Re: Simplicity has a future
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: Simplicity has a future
- From: Vladimir Oka
- Simplicity has a future
- Prev by Date: Re: malloc() implementation
- Next by Date: Re: legality of forward declaration
- Previous by thread: Re: Simplicity has a future
- Next by thread: Re: Simplicity has a future
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|