Re: malloc() implementation
- From: Flash Gordon <spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 15:19:08 +0100
Richard Tobin wrote:
In article <jue0l3xomr.ln2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Flash Gordon <spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Read C Programming Kerninghan & Ritchie you will get the idea.
Get the idea about what? Please provide context when responding, there is no guarantee that people can see the post you are replying to.
It's a good answer to almost every on-topic question in comp.lang.c,
so the context doesn't matter :-)
The standard and the FAQ are better answers ;-)
In any case, last time I looked I'm sure that K&R did not describe how to implement malloc which is what the subject line of this thread is..
It describes the implementation of a "rudimentary" storage allocator
as an example in the section on Address Arithmetic (5.4).
My reply was still technically accurate, I was sure of what I stated. It just happens that I was wrong to be sure of it ;-)
--
Flash Gordon, living in interesting times.
Web site - http://home.flash-gordon.me.uk/
comp.lang.c posting guidelines and intro:
http://clc-wiki.net/wiki/Intro_to_clc
.
- References:
- malloc() implementation
- From: Karsten Jung
- Re: malloc() implementation
- From: Haider
- Re: malloc() implementation
- From: Flash Gordon
- Re: malloc() implementation
- From: Richard Tobin
- malloc() implementation
- Prev by Date: Re: legality of forward declaration
- Next by Date: Re: legality of forward declaration
- Previous by thread: Re: malloc() implementation
- Next by thread: Re: malloc() implementation
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|