Re: casting
- From: "Old Wolf" <oldwolf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 12 Jun 2006 23:27:45 -0700
Keith Thompson wrote:
Richard Heathfield <invalid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
The difference is that, for implementation-defined behaviour, the
implementation is required to *document* this effect. If you want to format
your drive, such a feature can be extremely useful, n'est-ce-pas?
The other difference is that, in the case of implementation-defined
behavior, the standard provides two or more possibilities and the
implementation has to pick one of them.
What are the two or more possibilities for an out-of-range
assignment?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: casting
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: casting
- References:
- casting
- From: Christian Christmann
- Re: casting
- From: CBFalconer
- Re: casting
- From: Keith Thompson
- Re: casting
- From: CBFalconer
- Re: casting
- From: jaysome
- Re: casting
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: casting
- From: Keith Thompson
- casting
- Prev by Date: Re: functions that take many arguments...... + extern - what about it?
- Next by Date: Re: Using static to init vars?
- Previous by thread: Re: casting
- Next by thread: Re: casting
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|