Re: Segfault City

On Sat, 24 Jun 2006 10:00:56 UTC, spinoza1111@xxxxxxxxx wrote:


(Actually, using my normal gcc switches, it doesn't even get past TP3, but
it will at least compile if you just use gcc -o foo foo.c, after hacking it
around a bit to do things like mending the line-spanning single-line
comments and string literals, which - in fairness to the author - are
probably an artifact of the Webification of the code.)

I wonder how long I'll take to stop laughing.

I can understand you responding, Rirchard, since the web page contains a
comment about you, but I think it would have been more helpful to Edward
Nilges if you'd just sent him a private e-mail pointing out some of the
errors, such as the use of strcat in

printf( strcat(strcat("The %s program calculates primes ",
"in a user-specifiable range. "),
"Use the following syntax: %s"),
strArgValues[0],
SYNTAX_REMINDER );

None of the bloody beginner who had understund 1% of C and what K&R
says about would ever write such bull*** as you. So you've proven
yourself as having not even an idea what C is, to dumb to understund
it and lying around.

It's evident from the introductory text that Edward isn't a C
practitioner (e.g., he mentions how he had to figure out the declaration
syntax for arrays) and is used to more object-oriented languages, and

Actually, I started in machine language. And as it happened I had to
refigure the syntax since I had (briefly) started re-using C.

You have never written a single procedure in C free of errors. You've
not even an idea what C is and would never learn it as you've proven
already.

the code, such as the above, makes it painfully evident that he doesn't
have anybody doing quality assurance of the code -- which, one is led
to believe, is used in some C.Sc. course.

Look what spinoza1111@xxxxxxxxx says about himself:

You are clearly a loser. You don't even know that a professional would
not feel right about using a management puff phrase like "quality
assurance" (which usually and in practice means the eradication of
anything like quality) but would instead post reasons why he felt the
code to be incorrect. It may be (code is like that) but after several
months' hiatus I see nothing wrong.

So long you says that about yoursef you are 100% correct. If you means
somebody else who has at lest 20 hours experience in C you are a self
fucking liar.


The code ran on the Navia compiler. Do illumine us.

It does NOT run under any real OS.


Perhaps he'd be glad to receive some help about that?

Not from people whose main interest is establishing their shaky
self-confidence exclusively on sand (silicon) by tearing down others.

We've learned already that you are only a twit who is absolutely
learresistent.

Who are afraid to make CONSTRUCTIVE suggestions for modification, since
they might recursively be flamed because when you make a CONSTRUCTIVE
suggestion it contains other than negative assertions, and each one is
recursively subject to lampoon by people as "wrong" who cannot even say
why in clear English, but must instead refer to the idiosyncrasies of
their favorite compiler.

The description of yourself is good. But confuse that not with any
other peoples around the world. You are the only troll.

This discussion is useless. I have written enough code to be far more
interested in my competence in more important areas of life (such as
common decency) than "competing" with thugs...who were not invited to
post at a moderated site, and will be excluded should they choose to do
so in this matter by the moderator.

What code? Surely, not a single line of code in C that is in some
productive program. You've proven yourself really as true washout.

--
Tschau/Bye
Herbert

Visit http://www.ecomstation.de the home of german eComStation
eComStation 1.2 Deutsch ist da!
.