Re: qsort() results: implementation dependent?

Max wrote:
[...]
You are right and it is what the real code does. I gave an simpler
example (already tried) to focus on the topic.

The simpler version has a bug, as has already been
explained. Now: Is that bug an artifact of the simplification
process, or is it also present in the original? Oh, drat: my
Ouija board is in the shop getting its phlogiston generator
repaired ...

--
Eric Sosman
esosman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
.